The debate is about the nature of chess chunks. One possibility states that chunks are built by encoding particular combinations of pieces-on-squares (POSs), and that chunks are formed mostly by “close” pieces (in a “Euclidean” sense). A complementary hypothesis, as proposed by Alexandre Linhares and Paulo Brum[6] , is that chunks are encoded by abstract, semantic information such as given in following positions, the Fool's mate and its “most economical” representation, as given by Jenő Bán[7] :
rnb1kbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/6Pq/5P2/PPPPP2P
/RNBQKBNR w KQkq -
Merim Bilalić, Fernand Gobet (2007). They do what they are told to do: The influence of instruction on (chess) expert perception - Commentary on Linhares and Brum (2007). Cognitive Science. pdf
a Brazilian computer scientist, research professor of public and business administration at Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV), Rio de Janeiro [1] , and currently director-general of the Brazilian Chapter of the Club of Rome. His research interests include cognition in chess, where he is a critique of Chase and Simon's heavily quoted work Perception in chess [2] , controversial debated by Fernand Gobet et al. [3] [4] .
Table of Contents
The Nature of Chunks
The debate is about the nature of chess chunks. One possibility states that chunks are built by encoding particular combinations of pieces-on-squares (POSs), and that chunks are formed mostly by “close” pieces (in a “Euclidean” sense). A complementary hypothesis, as proposed by Alexandre Linhares and Paulo Brum [6] , is that chunks are encoded by abstract, semantic information such as given in following positions, the Fool's mate and its “most economical” representation, as given by Jenő Bán [7] :/RNBQKBNR w KQkq -
See also
Selected Publications
[8]External Links
References
What links here?
Up one level